user1873

Earth

BG.SE

Age: 37

The economy is in fact over-expanded, particularly in railroad construction, and the weak link turns out to be the banking house of Jay Cooke and Company, which helped the U.S. Government finance the Civil War and also underwrote the construction of the Northern Pacific Railroad. Jay Cooke and Company, a large and respected banking house declares itself bankrupt, and announces its failure on September 18, 1873.. (The bank's collapse precipitates the "Panic of 1873" and the ensuing three yea depression during which more than 10,000 businesses fail.     The basic economic problems are overproduction, a declining market and deflation. Investors in Europe, where a depression is already underway, begin to call in American loans. The New York Stock Exchange closes its doors for 10 days; other businesses fail; and railroad construction is curtailed, with some railroads defaulting on their bonds. The unemployed begin to move about the country seeking jobs, and bread lines appear in the cities. The hard times drove numbers of laboring people and those in humble circumstances to the West and other portions of the country, to seek the rewards which the stagnation of business in the great commercial centre denied them.

9h
revised Is it accurate to say that 97% of experts agree that global warming is anthropogenic?
deleted 153 characters in body
9h
revised Is it accurate to say that 97% of experts agree that global warming is anthropogenic?
deleted 153 characters in body
10h
comment Is it accurate to say that 97% of experts agree that global warming is anthropogenic?
You realize that they contacted some of the scientists later and found that 35% "Expresses position that human's role on recent global warming is uncertain/undefined" Not only that, but of those respondents whose papers were previously rated as "No Position", only 54% endorsed AGW (meaning 46% either rejected it or were uncertain). If you apply those results to the other ~8000 abstracts, you get a 66%/33% split for endorse AGW versus undefined.
10h
comment Is it accurate to say that 97% of experts agree that global warming is anthropogenic?
Of course, the whole premise here is farcical, even GW Deniers believe that humans contribute to Global Warming. Yes, humans expel CO2 and H2O through respiriation, so yes GW is anthropogenic. What they disagree on is how significant a factor humans are (not the primary cause). We know that cats also expel CO2 (I know Jane Dows pussy Furball does), but you don't here alarmists calling for drastic changes in pet ownership or feral cat elimination (we need to kill Furball to save the planet).
10h
revised Is it accurate to say that 97% of experts agree that global warming is anthropogenic?
added 564 characters in body
10h
answered Is it accurate to say that 97% of experts agree that global warming is anthropogenic?
20h
comment How nudism can be legal in public places?
@DJClayworth, yes but not as simplistic as it depends. Did my answer give the impression that nudity is always legal in those countries? ("it is legal to be naked in public in some circumstances like sunbathing, skinny dipping, or similar activities")
20h
comment Is it accurate to say that 97% of experts agree that global warming is anthropogenic?
"human activity is causing global warming" gives the impression that climate scientists believe that human causes are the primary cause of global warming. Only a slight majority 54% (+/-4%) of climate scientists think that recent temperatures are outside natural fluctuations. So, you might want to say, "human activity is one of the causes of GW", (but, there is considerable debate how much of an effect humans have on the climate)
1d
awarded Nice Question
1d
comment What were Margaret Sanger's goals when she founded Planned Parenthood?
Any sources to site?
2d
answered Commerce in Seven Wonders: possible to buy the same resource more than once in the same turn?
May
18
comment Is It Illegal For The IRS To Target Groups Based On Political Views?
My answer to the other IRS/Tea Party Q covers this. The equal protection clause is the law, Yick Wo v Hopkins would be an example of a SCOTUS case based on it. Worse yet, imagine if it wasn't illegal. The IRS could choose to have a tax holiday for everyone who registered Democrat. Then the next election cycle, whomever won could promise the same (since tax audits can go back 3 years, you better make sure your party wins :) )
May
18
revised What are the reasons for not letting protection against the criminals be left to trained professionals?
added 84 characters in body
May
18
answered What is constructivism in international relations?
May
18
reviewed Satisfactory What was the reasoning behind putting the right to keep and bear arms in the US Constitution?
May
18
reviewed Satisfactory What are the reasons for not letting protection against the criminals be left to trained professionals?
May
18
reviewed Satisfactory Why are there so many unscheduled/premature elections in Israel?
May
18
reviewed Satisfactory What governmental power does the Monarch hold in Great Britain?
May
18
answered What are the reasons for not letting protection against the criminals be left to trained professionals?
May
18
reviewed Satisfactory Illegal vs Unconstitutional
1 2 3 4 5