San Francisco, CA
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use itertools."
Now they have
next(takewhile(not_, count())) problems.
Since I've been asked about this multiple times now:
It's a reference to "Now they have two problems" about regular expressions.
next(takewhile(not_, count())) is guaranteed to give you
0, and pretty efficiently… but it's not exactly readable. Which is the joke.
itertools does solve all your problems, but you don't always need to use it.
If you don't grasp the paradigm, go read David Beazley's presentations. Once you do: "I've got a CSV, and I want to group the rows by…" Pass a
groupby. "I've got a bunch of values, and I want to take them 4 at a time and…" Use
grouper from the recipes. "I've got a file, and I want to take each pair of adjacent lines and…"
next one copy, and
zip them. And so on.
But of course some problems have an even easier solution, and once you start thinking in terms of sequences of transformations on iterators, sometimes you'll miss the easier answer.
(The exact same thing happens with
numpy, of course.)
Q&A for professional and enthusiast programmers
Q&A for programming puzzle enthusiasts and code golfers
Q&A for peer programmer code reviews
Q&A for meta-discussion of the Stack Exchange family of Q&A websites
Q&A for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development
Q&A for students, researchers and practitioners of computer science
Q&A for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems
Q&A for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts
Q&A for people seeking specific software recommendations
Q&A for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields
Q&A for people interested in governments, policies, and political processes