Feanor

Krakow, Poland

Age: 23

1d
revised Derivate as a division of differentials
added 866 characters in body
1d
answered Derivate as a division of differentials
2d
awarded Revival
2d
comment Is closure of a semigroup again a semigroup?
@Martin: Thank you, it is a complete and great answer; sorry for not accepting it sooner.
2d
accepted Is closure of a semigroup again a semigroup?
May
19
comment Independent and uniformly distributed on $(\frac{1}{2},1]$
What do you mean by "normally distributed on $(1/2,1]$? Uniformly distributed, perhaps?
May
19
comment Is closure of a semigroup again a semigroup?
@MartinSleziak: Thank you, this is precisely the type of example I was looking for!
May
19
comment Is closure of a semigroup again a semigroup?
@HagenvonEitzen: That is what I would suspect. What I was hoping for is a more elementary example to give some intuition how this particular piece of wishful thinking fails.
May
19
comment Is closure of a semigroup again a semigroup?
@tomasz: That's absolutely right, thank you for pointing this out.
May
19
comment Is closure of a semigroup again a semigroup?
The one I know, and the one I am interested in primarily, is the \v{C}ech-Stone compactification of a discrete semigroup like $\mathbb{N}$. However, it is not very easy to get a hold on how things work there.
May
19
asked Is closure of a semigroup again a semigroup?
May
19
accepted Additive maps modulo $1$ - what do they look like?
May
19
accepted Should I put interpunction after formulas?
May
17
comment Convergence of sequence
@AmireBendjeddou: Thank you, it is a very kind thing of you to write. I am glad I could be helpful.
May
17
comment Convergence of sequence
@JimJay: Yes, thank you :) Mistake corrected
May
17
revised Convergence of sequence
edited body
May
17
answered Convergence of sequence
May
15
revised Ball-counting problem (Combinatorics)
added 389 characters in body
May
15
answered Ball-counting problem (Combinatorics)
May
15
comment What would be the immediate implications of a formula for prime numbers?
The third formula blew my mind. Until now I was convinced that any formula for a prime has to either contain a parameter that cannot be effectively computed, or has to be immensely complicated. This one is so elegant!
1 2 3 4 5