Feanor

Krakow/Oxford

Age: 26

2d
awarded Famous Question
Jul
23
reviewed Approve suggested edit on What is the philosophical status of category theory?
Jul
23
awarded Good Question
Jul
13
awarded Popular Question
Jul
11
awarded Good Question
Jul
11
comment Is Wolfram wrong about unique 3-colorability, or am I just confused?
@DavidRicherby: The issue is not left-right symmetry, but up-down symmetry. The right-left symmetry is indeed harmless.
Jul
11
comment Is Wolfram wrong about unique 3-colorability, or am I just confused?
By the way, it's quite ironic that the entry on Wolfram under discussion specifically mentions two instances from the literature where incorrect examples of uniquely 3-colourable graphs are given, and makes a point of explaining why they are incorrect.
Jul
11
comment Is Wolfram wrong about unique 3-colorability, or am I just confused?
@MarkS. I just did.
Jul
11
accepted Is Wolfram wrong about unique 3-colorability, or am I just confused?
Jul
10
awarded Popular Question
Jul
10
awarded Nice Question
Jul
10
comment Is Wolfram wrong about unique 3-colorability, or am I just confused?
This would seem to work. Thanks!
Jul
10
comment Is Wolfram wrong about unique 3-colorability, or am I just confused?
@J.Loreaux As defined by Wolfram (and I think this is the usual definition) two colourings are distinct if they give a different partition (see the linked page, first definition).
Jul
10
asked Is Wolfram wrong about unique 3-colorability, or am I just confused?
Jun
27
comment Find the fourier series of the function
Some context would be useful. What have you tried so far?
Jun
27
answered Why is $x^{100} = 1 \mod 1000$ if $x < 1000$ and $\gcd (x,1000) = 1$?
Jun
25
answered Prove that $A_{100} \gt 14$ where $A_{n}=A_{n-1}+\frac{1}{A_{n-1}}$ and $A_1=1$
Jun
24
awarded Civic Duty
Jun
23
comment Is it bad form to use the word exciting in a paper, when discussing other people's results?
@GEdgar: Of course I don't. Sorry if I wasn't very explicit about it, but (as far as I can tell) one whould try to avoid praising one's own work as far as possible.
Jun
23
revised Is it bad form to use the word exciting in a paper, when discussing other people's results?
added 1 character in body
1 2 3 4 5