Helder Velez

Lisbon, Portugal

Age: 60

A new Evolving Climate Model (ECM) without the Snowball Earth

A Model of Past Earth’s Climate from Isotopic and Biologic Data and Its Relationship with Orbits’ Expansion
Abstract: The first model of the past hot Earth’s climate consistently indicated by isotopic and biologic data.. This model.. Evolving Climate Model (ECM), accurately matches a 3 Gy long compilation of $\delta^{18}O$ data. An important consequence is the ...well-known but until now mysterious occurrence: the Great Oxygenation Event (GOE). A solution ..for.. “dolomite problem” and new explanations ..for..the origin of petroleum and of protocontinents. ..the ECM presents ideal conditions for the massive production of long organic molecules... life evolution, .. the Cambrian.. explained and fitted by the ECM, exposing a previously unknown connection between the evolution of life and climate. The most likely cause.. is the expansion of orbits;... can explain the ECM, the receding of the Moon and the water on early Mars..


Formal proof that a SHRINKING ATOM is the cause of the space expansion:

Because we measure the atoms with the atoms all the equations of physics hold good whatever the atomic size, (ex:check the def of mass unit, kg, as an ensemble of N atoms and the mass of an atom as 1/N of that) you can see a formal proof, here:

A self-similar model of the Universe unveils the nature of dark energy

If you do not agree with the proof then post your answer to this post: PSE-How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?.
Note: I've a lot of persistent downvoters and they always refused to write the why they think that I'm wrong, even now that I've offered 500 points for answers against my position.

Online book, by Alfredo Gouveia de Oliveira http://outrafisica.blogs.sapo.pt. Using only standard physics, the author presents an alternative view of the History of the Universe.

papers of my friend Alfredo in the arxiv:

Dec
14
asked The initial presumed temperature of the universe is derived from data?
Dec
8
comment Why does the rule for multiplication/division take into consideration the no. of significant figures?
related physics.stackexchange.com/q/8914 and physics.stackexchange.com/q/14820
Dec
6
comment Good Map/Reduce examples for explanation
To the last four questions that I searched for, I've found them closed as non constructive on this site. By fortune they have answers already. To the authors I endorse my gratitude and, as of now, there were more than 80 individuals that do not understand the closing policy. Not that it matters to others but I'm a professional programmer since the start of the 80's and, by now, I found myself asking the wrong questions :)
Nov
30
comment Is this Batman equation for real?
@Jonjongot check the Patel answer (equal to my comment), and past the equation to the google search text window. The batman graph will appear then. (in my eq the symbol '–' following the last 0.9 do not belong to the eq). My google chrome browser accepts much more than 32 words.
Oct
28
awarded Autobiographer
Oct
28
awarded Supporter
Oct
25
comment How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?
@DavePhD I'm not sure that the equatiom you linked is correct: see the first eq at 21cm Cosmology by Tzu-Ching Chang et al where $\Delta E \propto m_e$
Oct
25
comment How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?
To justify my position (not really important because the 'space expansion' is not offering an explanation) you can think that the electromagnetic/gravitic fields are expanding and energy in the fields come from, well,the particle, or one can think that there is no uniform motion and particles are always accelerating and radiating energy. Remember that I asked for a reference? There is not, imo.
Oct
25
comment How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?
**Make no mistake: NO, no, no "Milky Way is the galaxy with the heaviest electrons" : After you reread my position you should think on 'ligther', but this is also incorrect. In any moment in time all the electrons/protons/neutrons/... are equal one to the others all over the universe, But in the past they were heavier than now. Note that we can not see light from the present because time is needed to come from there$_{(now)}$ to here$_{(now)}$. Then, there is nothing special about the MW.
Oct
25
comment How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?
Make no mistake: I did not change any equation - only it is shown for the first time that the equations of physics are valid in a space invariant referential (ergo:variant atom) besides the usual atomic referential (invariant atom, ergo: space expansion). The equation that explains the observations was formally derived and is a novelty: the evolution of the units M,L,T,Q is an exponential law.
Oct
25
awarded Benefactor
Oct
25
comment How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?
In your opinion do we have enough data (H1 survey) to perceive the difference between the models?
Oct
22
comment How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?
I'm 100% sure that no one else proposed in the way I'm saying. The consensus never explored what I'm showing. EVERYBODY seems to KNOW that I'm wrong, but NO ONE provided an argument against me. In a simple way: if there is an explanation to the redshift not involving cosmological motion then BBT is rescueless, because BB appears as an explanation for it. I'm giving away my credit (500 points) in an attempt to invite anyone to deny my saying.
Oct
17
awarded Promoter
Oct
8
comment How do I make an equation to be dimensionally consistent?
sorry, I was late and it is similar to the other answer.
Oct
8
answered How do I make an equation to be dimensionally consistent?
Oct
6
comment Why the galaxies forms 2D plane (or spiral-like) instead of 3D ball (or spherical-like)?
in an initial 3D random environment, the outcome of the collisions do not have a preferred plane, direction. The answers are correct here: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/24885/shapes-of-galaxies . Or else there are strange 'pizza makers' in the sky.
Oct
1
awarded Popular Question
Sep
29
comment How do we know that these radio bursts are from billions of light-years away?
WHY ? : "(In fact, radio waves that are too low in frequency cannot propagate at all through the "emptiness" of space.)"
Sep
29
comment How vacuous is intergalactic space?
Cal univ measure is the Milky Way value. The Universe Today value is the average ISM measure on all the universe. IMO.
1 2 3 4 5