Helder Velez

Lisbon, Portugal

Age: 61


A self-similar model of the Universe unveils the nature of dark energy

Because we measure the atoms with the atoms and all the equations of physics hold good whatever the atomic size in this document is presented a formal proof that a SHRINKING ATOM is the cause of the space expansion. No dark energy, no BB, no space expansion, no inflation,...


A new Evolving Climate Model (ECM) and NO Snowball Earth

A Model of Past Earth’s Climate from Isotopic and Biologic Data and Its Relationship with Orbits’ Expansion
Abstract: The first model of the past hot Earth’s climate consistently indicated by isotopic and biologic data.. This model.. Evolving Climate Model (ECM), accurately matches a 3 Gy long compilation of $\delta^{18}O$ data. An important consequence is the ...well-known but until now mysterious occurrence: the Great Oxygenation Event (GOE). A solution ..for.. “dolomite problem” and new explanations ..for..the origin of petroleum and of protocontinents. ..the ECM presents ideal conditions for the massive production of long organic molecules... life evolution, .. the Cambrian.. explained and fitted by the ECM, exposing a previously unknown connection between the evolution of life and climate. The most likely cause.. is the expansion of orbits;... can explain the ECM, the receding of the Moon and the water on early Mars..


If you do not agree with the proof then post your answer to this post: PSE-How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?.
Note: I've a lot of persistent downvoters and they always refused to write the why they think that I'm wrong, even now that I'd offered 500 points for answers against my position.

Online book, by Alfredo Gouveia de Oliveira http://outrafisica.blogs.sapo.pt. Using only standard physics, the author presents an alternative view of the History of the Universe.

papers of in the arxiv:

May
18
comment What physics paper would a high school student be able to read?
imo, the papers should be available for free (not behind a pay-wall).
May
16
comment What is variable resistors?
WP-Varistor
May
16
comment Alternatives to the neutrino in the beta spectrum?
Thank you Mr dmckee, sincerely.
May
16
answered Alternatives to the neutrino in the beta spectrum?
May
15
comment Andromeda is made of antimatter. Am I wrong? Why?
by 1933, in his Nobel lecture, Dirac formulated the subject in my terms and, by that time, he already have most of information we have now. "The two kinds of stars would both show exactly the same spectra, and there would be no way of distinguishing them by present astronomical methods"
May
14
comment Is the dimension "number of particles" a fundamental, or derived dimension (based on mass), or does it depend on the context, or is it dimensionless?
Here I can only pinpoint the relation between the 'number of particles' and the mass unit as asked by the OP. By definition the mass of 1 Kg is the mass of X atoms and 1 atom = 1/X Kg is a recursive definition i.e. the weight of an electron is a free parameter (my claim). Because the spectra of a larger atom (of the past as I say) and the one of an atom in motion (receding galaxies) are indistinguishable I will credit 500 points if I'm wrong on this claim
May
14
comment Is the dimension "number of particles" a fundamental, or derived dimension (based on mass), or does it depend on the context, or is it dimensionless?
@JimtheEnchanter et al. Now, you can conclude by yourself that the mass unit is the same whatever the absolute size of an atom (because it is recursive !). I know that vixra has a lot of foolish. To read or not to read that is the question that a young cosmologist as you will have to answer. A preliminary version at arxiv-2002 . Downvotes, plenty, scientific counter-arguments 0.
May
14
comment Is the dimension "number of particles" a fundamental, or derived dimension (based on mass), or does it depend on the context, or is it dimensionless?
@ACuriousMind: please explain why the mass unit definition is not recursive! It is recursive is my point. I'm not writing about photons, but barionic matter, as deduced by the context. The 'particle' nature of the photon is questionable, imo, see There Are No Pea Shooters for Photons by Marty Green .
May
14
revised Is the dimension "number of particles" a fundamental, or derived dimension (based on mass), or does it depend on the context, or is it dimensionless?
quoting myself. I think I'm allowed.
May
14
answered Is the dimension "number of particles" a fundamental, or derived dimension (based on mass), or does it depend on the context, or is it dimensionless?
May
12
comment Is spacetime absolute?
This breaks Lorentz symmetry: Parity_violation - "Although parity is conserved in electromagnetism, strong interactions and gravity, it turns out to be violated in weak interactions." as seen here CPT_symmetry"A consequence of this derivation is that a violation of CPT automatically indicates a Lorentz violation."
May
11
comment What made Bohr quantise angular momentum and not some other quantity?
he is the author of the The Electromagnetic Field Theory Textbook available online, thanks prof.
May
11
comment What made Bohr quantise angular momentum and not some other quantity?
welcome to PSE, prof Bo Thidé
May
11
answered Simple Harmonic Motion of sphere
May
4
revised Alternatives to the neutrino in the beta spectrum?
added 77 characters in body
May
4
asked Alternatives to the neutrino in the beta spectrum?
May
4
comment Will 1 gram of matter moving at relativistic speeds completely annihilate a larger quantity of stationary antimatter?
"there is no absolute notion of velocity" ... : I'm considering that the Solar System was found to be travelling at V=369 km/s in relation to the CMB i.e. the distant stars. V is the SS absolute velocity in official references.
Apr
30
answered Can anyone explain this formula graphically?
Apr
27
comment What causes the black shimmering bands on a sun-lit surface?
can you post an image, please?
Apr
25
revised Is it possible to generate energy by the moon orbit?
comma
1 2 3 4 5