|
May
19 |
|
awarded | Teacher |
|
Sep
21 |
|
awarded | Custodian |
|
Jun
14 |
|
accepted | reverting from emacs keybindings in chrome |
|
Jun
14 |
|
answered | reverting from emacs keybindings in chrome |
|
May
10 |
|
comment |
proposed bug: compiz delay in changing window focus I have FFM set from before things got complicated (i.e., from metacity days). But running ccsm, I see that auto-raise is unset. Indeed, I don't want it to auto-raise, so this is good. While auto-raise delay is (suspiciously) 500, setting it to 10 doesn't change the focus delay. |
|
May
10 |
|
asked | proposed bug: compiz delay in changing window focus |
|
Apr
30 |
|
awarded | Scholar |
|
Apr
30 |
|
comment |
Sum over unique tags in a range That works, and thanks for the clear and detailed explanation. I made an auxiliary sheet ('criteria') in the workbook to store all the ranges and such and made all the item names be pointers to item names in the criteria page to avoid errors from typos spelling an item ('peear', oops). Many thanks! |
|
Apr
30 |
|
accepted | Sum over unique tags in a range |
|
Apr
26 |
|
comment |
Sum over unique tags in a range Oh, that's nifty, thanks, that's almost it! But it's not quite what I want, because it modifies the original range (when called from the menu) or requires contiguous ranges (grouped by). But I want the original range to remain sorted by date and, in another sheet in my workbook, I want to see a summary by item, dynamic as more items get added to (or changed in) the original range. |
|
Apr
26 |
|
revised |
Sum over unique tags in a range Thanks for the flag! |
|
Apr
26 |
|
asked | Sum over unique tags in a range |
|
Apr
25 |
|
comment |
reverting from emacs keybindings in chrome I think you've answered your own question in 124815. gconftool and gconf-editor are two ways to access the same information (commandline and gui). To get emacs bindings, set the value for key /desktop/gnome/interface/gtk_key_theme to Emacs. |
|
Apr
24 |
|
awarded | Student |
|
Apr
18 |
|
revised |
reverting from emacs keybindings in chrome edited tags |
|
Apr
18 |
|
awarded | Editor |
|
Apr
18 |
|
revised |
reverting from emacs keybindings in chrome edited title |
|
Apr
18 |
|
asked | reverting from emacs keybindings in chrome |
|
Apr
3 |
|
comment |
boost::test and verifying code is executed This is an interesting and useful approach, thanks. In my simple case, I'm not sure it adds much beyond what I get from handling the count myself, but in slightly more complex scenarios I suspect it would be quite helpful. [Since it's a useful answer and the only answer after many weeks, I'm also accepting it.] |
|
Apr
3 |
|
accepted | boost::test and verifying code is executed |
