All my contributions on the StackExchange network are placed under public domain to the extent possible by law.

I'm not fluent in English, sorry in advance.

2d
awarded Nice Question
Jan
27
awarded Necromancer
Jan
26
awarded Teacher
Jan
26
answered "(Не) в теме" for people who fall outside a group
Jan
23
awarded Autobiographer
Jan
23
awarded Supporter
Jan
22
comment Do some continental philosophers deliberately obfuscate their writing and why?
Again: you can think as much as you wish that this is why they write this way. But you don't provide sufficient evidence for that. The world is complex as hell, so just saying something that looks convincing only to someone who doesn't know game theory or cognitive psychology is not enough. Whining that everybody is against you because nobody is willing to agree with you right away is a failure mode, it's some kindergarten bullshit. I'm sorry, but you're argument is really primitive, you just have no idea what you're talking about.
Jan
22
comment Do some continental philosophers deliberately obfuscate their writing and why?
Dude, again, I'm not interested in Frankfurt school, Juws, Christianity, "religious elite", Rotschilds, Anunaks, Nibiru or whatever. It has nothing to do with the original question. You have to give evidence for your reasoning. Do you even know how evidence looks like? Your argument is crap, you don't give coherent logic, or reference the events or historical facts that would raise posterior probability of your assertions, or give a detailed framework, or whatever. You just throw random unsupported propositions and become angry nobody agrees. Your argument is crap. Deal with it.
Jan
22
comment Do some continental philosophers deliberately obfuscate their writing and why?
Dude, I am not defending the status quo. You are confused. And you are going to be heavily downvoted. Not because you are against capitalism, or Jews, or Frankfurt School, or monotheism. But because your argument is crap. The logic, not the content. Hell, I would upvote you even if you were a neo-Nazi (and I hate neo-Nazis), provided you had a coherent and valid argument. I'm sorry I can't explain myself so that you would see that claiming that Frankfurt school conspired with, say, Rotschilds, because they are both Jews, is a crap argument, and not "connecting the dots", as you think.
Jan
22
comment Do some continental philosophers deliberately obfuscate their writing and why?
Dude, I am not a philosopher, I am a programmer. I ask questions on this website because I want detailed answers with high amount of information. I don't pay for information, so you are not obliged to answer, but it's still true that the more information you provide, the better this answer is for me. The best answer is the one that can be a foundation of my further investigation in the topic. For that I need lucid logic, directions to where investigate further, intuition pumps, etc. You don't have that. You just ask me to believe you. I want to believe you, but I can't do it without evidence.
Jan
22
comment Do some continental philosophers deliberately obfuscate their writing and why?
Dude, you're wrong. Not in arguments themselves, there are loads of shit happening around the world, capitalism, imperialism, wars, hypocrisy. My country is an authoritarian shithole, for one. I am a super-cynical ultra-leftist myself. But your argument is logically invalid. If one asks you whether continental philosophers deliberately write crap, it's logically incorrect to answer that they are Jews, that Brazil is pro-Israel, that the asker is pro-monotheistic, or whatever. It just has nothing to do with the question. And even if it is true, you don't support it properly. All I'm sayin'.
Jan
22
comment Do some continental philosophers deliberately obfuscate their writing and why?
Regardless of intentions and evilness of Frankfurt School, saying that they are Jews is a non-sequitur, saying that Jews controlled something is a non-sequitur, speculating what I believe is a non-sequitur. Dude, you shouldn't be talking about logic if you use logical fallacies. All I'm saying your argument is weak as hell regardless whether it happens to be true or not.
Jan
22
comment Why does kworker cpu usage get so high?
possible duplicate of Kworker, what is it and why is it hogging so much CPU?
Jan
22
comment kworker taking 100% of one core
possible duplicate of Kworker, what is it and why is it hogging so much CPU?
Jan
22
comment Do some continental philosophers deliberately obfuscate their writing and why?
“composed mostly of jews, a group that owns lots of things, from universities to newspapers and industries”—dude, seriously? Some Jews were super-rich, some Jews were writing on philosophy, these 2 groups mostly did not intersect. Being a Jew is just one property, among many. It's basic set theory/logic, WTF.
Jan
19
awarded Famous Question
Jan
17
revised How does logocentrism entail metaphysics of presence?
Made a question narrower
Jan
17
awarded Commentator
Jan
17
asked How does logocentrism entail metaphysics of presence?
Jan
17
comment Why is Hegel more important than Schelling?
Please edit this answer to make it more readable.
1 2 3 4 5