|
May
22 |
|
answered | background jobs' garbled output |
|
May
22 |
|
comment |
background jobs' garbled output I think I'm going to fall back on a simple IO::Select, have a simple script spawn all commands at once. |
|
May
17 |
|
revised |
background jobs' garbled output Added a PS aboyt why the issue happens |
|
May
17 |
|
comment |
background jobs' garbled output Strict organization or not, GNU Parallel is not the solution to my question :/ And my actual technical problem is that it won't run with an ancient perl on crappy OS. I'll try to come up with something and post it here then. |
|
May
14 |
|
awarded | Yearling |
|
May
14 |
|
revised |
background jobs' garbled output Detailled GNU Parallel behaviour. |
|
May
13 |
|
awarded | Caucus |
|
May
13 |
|
comment |
background jobs' garbled output Because I am not allowed to. And I think it wouldn't work with an ancient version of perl. I know that's stupid. I'm the one who found that it would solve my problem, but I can't use it on my target environment. Anyway, I think my question is interesting, the world hasn't waited for GNU parallel to solve this kind of issue, has it ? |
|
May
12 |
|
answered | Perl send() UDP packet to multiple active clients |
|
May
12 |
|
comment |
background jobs' garbled output I'd like to get it as soon as possible, yes. Otherwise, whether you store it in memory or a file per process, I think that's the same solution. |
|
May
12 |
|
asked | background jobs' garbled output |
|
May
4 |
|
awarded | Yearling |
|
May
4 |
|
awarded | Yearling |
|
Apr
1 |
|
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Mar
11 |
|
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec
23 |
|
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec
19 |
|
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Nov
15 |
|
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Nov
9 |
|
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Oct
26 |
|
awarded | Supporter |
