|
Oct
17 |
|
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jul
25 |
|
accepted | Double buffering C# |
|
Jun
10 |
|
awarded | Analytical |
|
May
4 |
|
accepted | Custom server error codes spring MVC & tomcat |
|
Apr
30 |
|
comment |
Custom server error codes spring MVC & tomcat I'm using multistream controller with @RequestMapping annotation. My code actually looks like the following: @RequestMapping("report") public String report(Model model, @RequestParam(required=false) Integer tid) {...} |
|
Apr
29 |
|
asked | Custom server error codes spring MVC & tomcat |
|
Jul
29 |
|
comment |
Once a function name has been declared as 'virtual', can it ever be be made un-virtual again? but that will beat the supermarket principle in the class that declared it real. instead of being statically binded, the compiler there will put the code for the "dynaimc dispathc" (looking in the vtbl) instead of simple function call. Thus using the vtbl in places it is not needed and beating the supermarket principle (not paying for features that you aren't using). |
|
Jul
28 |
|
comment |
Once a function name has been declared as 'virtual', can it ever be be made un-virtual again? Generally that would be true. But the first standard is from 98 which had been influenced by the language itself as made by Stroustrup(83) and the fact that Stroustrup implemented the language this way (in order to cope with the language Principles including the supermarket Principle and the C backward compatibility) triggered the fact the C++ does not have the keyword real. You are talking as if C++ was first standardized and then implemented. Trust me, if he found a way to allow it without breaking his supermarket Principle and the C backward compatibility Principle, we would have real today |
|
Jul
28 |
|
answered | Once a function name has been declared as 'virtual', can it ever be be made un-virtual again? |
|
Jul
2 |
|
answered | Why can't we serialize the methods in Java? |
|
Jul
1 |
|
awarded | Citizen Patrol |
|
Jun
28 |
|
revised |
Indexing hash tables added 449 characters in body |
|
Jun
28 |
|
answered | Indexing hash tables |
|
Jun
28 |
|
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Jun
26 |
|
revised |
Confusion in C++ typo |
|
Jun
26 |
|
comment |
Confusion in C++ @Matthieu: what Konard said is what I meant. But You are right about the ->operator rather than the . operator. my mistake :) |
|
Jun
26 |
|
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Jun
26 |
|
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jun
26 |
|
accepted | Deleting email automatically |
|
Jun
26 |
|
awarded | Autobiographer |
