|
Aug
13 |
|
awarded | Scholar |
|
Aug
13 |
|
revised |
In a stored procedure (SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2) is it possible to return a NewSequentialID() without a temp table variable? added 9 characters in body; edited title |
|
Aug
13 |
|
accepted | In a stored procedure (SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2) is it possible to return a NewSequentialID() without a temp table variable? |
|
Aug
12 |
|
comment |
In a stored procedure (SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2) is it possible to return a NewSequentialID() without a temp table variable? I need to return the guid created by the new record in the sproc to the calling program. |
|
Aug
12 |
|
awarded | Commentator |
|
Aug
12 |
|
comment |
In a stored procedure (SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2) is it possible to return a NewSequentialID() without a temp table variable? newsequentialid() is used in the table definition for the DEFAULT value of the column. I need to return the guid created by the new record in the sproc to the calling program. |
|
Aug
12 |
|
asked | In a stored procedure (SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2) is it possible to return a NewSequentialID() without a temp table variable? |
|
May
8 |
|
comment |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET Steven above stated, "Note that using lock still outperformes ReaderWriterLockSlim in many cases", is that a consideration here with: BlockingCollection?
|
|
May
8 |
|
revised |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET edited body |
|
May
8 |
|
awarded | Supporter |
|
May
8 |
|
comment |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET Thanks, I'm looking into 'ReaderWriterLockSlim' now (.Net 3.5+ :-) |
|
May
8 |
|
comment |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET I'm not sure I understand the role of BufferLock, or why it's going before the strBuilderBuffer.Append(strSomeData); statement.?. The atomocy I need to guarantee for a buffer is in public void BufferAnalyze() between the reading && clearing of the buffer (as I attempted to do above in the re-editing of my question above. Sorry if I'm being obtuse.
|
|
May
8 |
|
comment |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET What you show above didn't make sense to me for what I'm trying to do... However, I added what I'm trying to do to my question above. |
|
May
8 |
|
revised |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET added 781 characters in body |
|
May
8 |
|
revised |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET added 109 characters in body; edited title |
|
May
8 |
|
comment |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET @vidstige they're in the method public void BufferAnalyze() (Though for illustrative purposes they're not back-to-back.)
|
|
May
8 |
|
comment |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET @JamesMichaelHare Will do. |
|
May
8 |
|
comment |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET unfortunately, platform is limited to 3.5... I'll keep that in mind for future projects however. |
|
May
8 |
|
awarded | Student |
|
May
8 |
|
comment |
Thread-safe buffer for .NET @JamesMichaelHare 3.5 currently... I'll look into that for future projects though, thanks. |
